CPI Update - Issue 97 - January 2012
The January 2012 edition of the Commercial Property Information Update is published today on this website.
If you are a subscriber (and you are logged in) you can access the update by clicking on CPI Update – January 2012 and opening the attachment.
The January 2012 issue of the CPI Update contains:
Case law commentary on:
- Another loss for developers on the village green - Leeds Group plc v Leeds City Council;
- What are the contractual implications of a non-payment of a deposit - Samarenko v Dawn Hill House Ltd;
- The need for signed writing on the sale of land - Francis v F. Berndes Ltd;
- Boundaries disputes - Drake v Fripp; Brown v Pretot;
- Adverse possession, and the animus possidendi – Chambers v London Borough of Havering;
- The effects of a vesting order following disclaimer - Fenland District Council v Sheppard;
- Professional negligence in a free half hour interview? Padden v Bevan Ashford Solicitors;
- An ECJ case on VAT and TOGCs - Finanzamt Ludenscheid v Christel Schriever;
- Compliance with covenants - a Taylor Wimpey demolition story.
Legislative developments in relation to:
VAT zero-rating of 'extra care accommodation';
A DCLG consultation on extending the right to buy;
Part M of the Building Regulations and the Equality Act 2010.
Practical comment on:
Compensation for improvements under Part I LTA 1927;
A new Law Society Practice Note on lender requests for conveyancing files;
A new Law Society Practice Note on lasting powers of attorney;
An SRA update on sale and rent back agreements;
A Charity Commission update on business rates relief (or the avoidance of rates through meanwhile use leases);
A City of London Law Society draft opinion letter for use in corporate matters;
Published 2nd January 2012.

